Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42250046›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026

Deep learning-driven inversion framework for shear modulus estimation in magnetic resonance elastography.

Hassan Iftikhar, Rizwan Ahmad, Arunark Kolipaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hassan IftikharBiomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. iftikhar.15@buckeyemail.osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4059-7008
Rizwan AhmadBiomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Arunark KolipakaBiomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

Magnetic Resonance Elastography as a Personalized Assessment of Intervertebral Disc MechanicsR01AR075062 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KOLIPAKA, ARUNARK, WALTER, BENJAMIN A. · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075062NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075062/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe multimodal direct inversion (MMDI) algorithm is widely used in magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to estimate tissue shear stiffness but relies on the Helmholtz equation, which assumes a uniform, homogeneous, and infinite medium. Its use of the Laplacian operator also makes it highly sensitive to noise. This study proposes a deep-learning-driven inversion framework for shear modulus estimation in MRE (DIME) to improve the robustness and accuracy of inversion.

methodsDIME was trained on displacement-stiffness pairs generated through finite element modeling (FEM), using small image patches to capture local wave behavior and enhance robustness to global variations. Validation was performed on homogeneous and heterogeneous FEM-simulated datasets. The method was further evaluated using an anatomy-informed simulated liver dataset with known ground truth (GT) and directly compared with MMDI. Finally, DIME was tested on in vivo liver MRE data from eight healthy and seven fibrotic subjects.

resultsIn FEM simulations, DIME produced stiffness maps with low inter-pixel variability, accurate boundary delineation, and higher correlation with GT than MMDI. In anatomy-informed liver simulations, DIME reproduced stiffness patterns with high fidelity (r = 0.99, R

conclusionsDIME demonstrated higher correlation with ground truth in simulations and visually similar stiffness maps in vivo, while MMDI displayed a larger bias that may be attributed to directional filtering. These results highlight the feasibility of DIME for clinical MRE applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInverse ProblemsInversion in MREMagnetic Resonance ElastographyMRE, Inversion

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.