Evidence mapPaperPMID 42250272Full record

ArticleJAMA2026

Insulin Costs and Use by Medicare Beneficiaries After the Inflation Reduction Act Out-of-Pocket Cap.

Rebecca Myerson, Nam Hyo Kim, John Romley, Dima Mazen Qato, Ying Cao, Erin Trish, Anne L Peters, Dana Goldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca MyersonEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nam Hyo KimUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
John RomleyUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Dima Mazen QatoUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Ying CaoUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Erin TrishUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Anne L PetersUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Dana GoldmanUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Funding

Insulin Access and Health Outcomes After the Inflation Reduction Act's Out-of-Pocket Spending CapsR01DK141885 · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · 2025 to 2025
$734k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK141885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Inflation Reduction Act capped out-of-pocket costs for insulin at $35 per 30-day supply for Medicare beneficiaries in 2023; the impact on insulin access and use is not known. Objective: To measure changes in insulin cost and use after the cap, overall and for insulin users with previously high out-of-pocket cost. Design, Setting, and Participants: Interrupted time series analysis using data from the United States from January 2021 through December 2023 to measure the additional changes experienced by insulin users with Medicare Part D insurance after the cap (2023) compared with before the cap (2021-2022). Exposure: The $35 out-of-pocket cap. Main Outcomes: Out-of-pocket cost per 30-day insulin supply (average and within-year range), 30-day insulin fills, adherence (proportion of days covered with basal insulin), and persistence (no days without basal insulin). Results: The study cohort included 2 860 394 insulin users (mean age, 70.7 years; 52% female). In 2023, almost no insulin fills exceeded the cap; in comparison, 13% of fills would have exceeded the cap in 2021-2022. Cost per 30-day supply of insulin was $22.95 before the policy and decreased to $18.16 after the policy (difference, -$4.79 [95% CI, -$4.84 to -$4.74]; relative reduction, 21%), and the within-year range declined from $22.73 to $11.77 (difference, -$10.96 [95% CI, -$11.07 to -$10.84]; relative reduction, 48%). Insulin fills, adherence, and persistence to basal insulin did not increase for the full cohort but did for people with high baseline cost for insulin. For people with baseline costs in the top decile (ie, above $58 on average per 30-day supply of insulin), 30-day insulin fills per year increased from 10.4 to 11.2 (difference, 0.8 fills [95% CI, 0.7 to 0.8]; relative increase, 8%), proportion of days covered increased from 59.7% to 62.4% (difference, 2.7 percentage points [95% CI, 2.5 to 2.8 percentage points], relative increase, 5%), and persistence increased from 7.5% to 8.5% (difference, 1 percentage point [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.2 percentage points]; relative increase, 13%). Conclusions and Relevance: The Medicare $35 insulin out-of-pocket cap decreased and stabilized insulin out-of-pocket cost, increasing insulin use for people with previously high out-of-pocket cost. These findings can inform the design of policies to boost insulin access among users with high out-of-pocket cost.

Indexed as

Drug CostsHealth ExpendituresHypoglycemic AgentsInflation, EconomicInsulinMedicare Part DAgedAged, 80 and overDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedUnited StatesHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID42250272
PMCPMC13242632

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.