Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42251643›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2026

Catalytic Enantioselective Intramolecular Aza-Michael Addition to α,β-Unsaturated Esters.

Evan G W Rutter, Cameron J MacRae, Haoran Xiong, Daniel Rozsar, Katherine F P Clarke, Darren J Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evan G W RutterDepartment of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7073-6725
Cameron J MacRaeDepartment of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2552-5755
Haoran XiongDepartment of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel RozsarDepartment of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-1722
Katherine F P ClarkeDepartment of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8952-1872
Darren J DixonDepartment of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-5236

Funding

EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Inorganic Chemistry for Future Manufacturing EP/S023828/1EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Synthesis for Biology and Medicine EP/L015838/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A bifunctional iminophosphorane (BIMP)-catalyzed enantioselective intramolecular aza-Michael reaction of sulfonamides to tethered α,β-unsaturated esters is described. Reactivity toward traditionally challenging ester Michael acceptors is achieved through careful catalyst design, enabling the synthesis of enantioenriched pyrrolidines, piperidines, and indoline derivatives in excellent yields (up to 99%) and enantiomeric ratios (up to 97.5:2.5 er) under operationally simple conditions. The broad reaction scope demonstrates excellent tolerance to variation in the sulfonamide group, the Michael acceptor, and substituents on the tether in between. Furthermore, the synthetic utility of the method is highlighted by gram-scale reactions at reduced catalyst loadings and by downstream derivatization of multiple enantiopure products.

Indexed as

enantioselective catalysisenantioselectivityMichael additionnitrogen heterocyclesorganocatalysis

Identifiers

PMID42251643
PMCPMC13383253

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.