ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Early Evolution of the Prokaryotic Transcription Factor Repertoire.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription initiation is regulated by transcription factors (TFs). Though TFs determine phenotype, they are nonessential for minimal cellular life. Given this and the idea that it is a certain level of organism "complexity" that calls for transcription regulation, we traced the evolution of TF repertoire on a bacterio-archaeal phylogeny using a dataset of ∼500,000 TFs. The most ancestral prokaryotes probably encoded multiple TFs. These, based on functions of extant relatives, possibly regulated sugar-fermentation metabolism, sensed overall metabolic state and redox, responded to DNA damage or bound metals; many of which are consistent with some reconstructions of ancestral gene pools and physiologies. The number of TFs and their superfamily-level diversity, through evolutionary history, are similar to those in extant bacteria. These suggest pre-LUCA diversification of TF families. Emergence of new TFs along the phylogeny shows innovation early in prokaryote evolution, in contrast to eukaryotes, in which many TF families emerged in bursts at multicellular lineages. Gains of TFs late in prokaryotic evolution appear to be products of horizontal acquisition of proteins discovered earlier along some other lineage. We speculate on the difference between the evolutionary trajectory of prokaryotic and eukaryotic TF repertoire and how this might be explained by how complexity is envisioned in these two different kingdoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.