ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2026
Radiosensitizing effect of astaxanthin on radiation-induced cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells.
Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiotherapy (RT) is a primary treatment for cancer, including breast cancer, but its effectiveness is limited by severe side effects. Radiosensitization using natural products can enhance efficacy while reducing radiation doses. Astaxanthin (AST), a natural carotenoid with antioxidant properties, requires further investigation for its role in cancer therapy. Especially in many previous studies, AST found to has prooxidant effect in cancer cells reverse its antioxidant effect in normal cells.
methodsThis study explored AST’s potential to enhance the cytotoxic effects of ionizing radiation (IRR) against MCF7 breast cancer cells and the underlying mechanisms. Cytotoxicity, apoptosis induction, anti-metastatic activity, and cell cycle distribution were analyzed in response to IRR with and without AST.
resultsIRR alone showed limited cytotoxicity, whereas addition of AST significantly enhanced IRR’s effects, reducing IC50 by ten folds in combination treatment. AST increased apoptosis markers (caspase-3 and BAX/BCL2 ratio) by 16% and 67.8%, respectively. It also decreased proliferation index and S-phase ratio by 43.24% and 42.6%, respectively. AST further reduced metastatic markers MMP2 and MMP9 by 25% and 33.8%, respectively, in combination therapy. Additionally, AST exhibited a pro-oxidant effect, elevating MDA and H₂O₂ levels by 16.9% and 18.9%, respectively. It also caused cell cycle arrest at the S and G2/M phases, making cells more susceptible to IRR.
conclusionThese findings confirm AST’s radiosensitizing effect via apoptosis induction, cell cycle disruption, and anti-metastatic activity, supporting its potential in enhancing radiotherapy efficacy for breast cancer cells. Further research is warranted to explore its application in cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.