Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42252403›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Rethinking Cognitive Interventions in Bipolar Disorder: Feasibility and First Insights From Metacognitive Group Training (MCT-Bipolar).

Antonie Schoenleber, Esther Quinlivan, Lena Jelinek, Franziska Miegel, Felix Bermpohl, Steffen Moritz, Stefanie Schreiter, Eva Friedel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonie SchoenleberCharité - University Medical Center Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-5017
Esther QuinlivanCharité - University Medical Center Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Lena JelinekDepartment of Psychotherapy and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska MiegelDepartment of Psychotherapy and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-8665
Felix BermpohlCharité - University Medical Center Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité at St. Hedwig Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Steffen MoritzDepartment of Psychotherapy and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-0143
Stefanie SchreiterCharité - University Medical Center Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-0029
Eva FriedelCharité - University Medical Center Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-4234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The feasibility of psychological interventions should be considered when developing and evaluating new therapy methods. Indicators of low feasibility may be a high dropout rate, a low attendance rate and low treatment satisfaction, which threaten the validity of clinical research studies. Given the severity and chronicity of bipolar disorder and its impact on psychosocial functioning, effective treatments are needed to alleviate depressive and manic symptoms. The study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary treatment effects of a novel disorder-specific metacognitive group training for bipolar disorder (MCT-Bipolar), which targets cognitive biases specific to depressive and manic episodes while also incorporating mindfulness techniques. Forty-eight outpatients with bipolar disorder I and II participated in the training conducted by a clinical psychologist for eight consecutive weeks in groups of six to 10 people. Inclusion criteria were euthymia or mild or moderate depressive symptoms. Predictors of dropout and attendance rates were analysed using regression methods, and secondary exploratory analyses examined changes in various efficacy indicators between baseline, 1 week after training and 6 months after training using linear mixed models. In total, 10 participants (20.8%) dropped out, while completers attended an average of six out of eight sessions. Treatment satisfaction of the completers was high. Linear mixed models revealed an increase in mindfulness from baseline to follow-up. Results on psychosocial functioning showed an increase from baseline to post-training, though this effect disappeared at the 6-month follow-up. Findings support the feasibility of MCT-Bipolar and suggest potential benefits for mindfulness and short-term psychosocial functioning. Further research with larger samples and a control group is needed to assess its efficacy. Trial Registration: The evaluation study is registered in the German Registry of Clinical trials (DRKS, registration number DRKS00035704) and received approval from the ethical committee of Charité - University Hospital Berlin (No. EA1/076/22).

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderCognitive Behavioral TherapyMetacognitionMindfulnessPsychotherapy, GroupAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsPatient SatisfactionTreatment Outcomebipolar disorderdropoutfeasibilitylinear mixed modelmetacognitive trainingsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42252403
PMCPMC13243341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.