ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2026
Deferoxamine Improves Radiation-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation-induced peripheral neuropathy (RIPN) is a devastating sequela of radiation therapy (XRT). Current treatment options are limited. Deferoxamine (DFO) has been useful in treating radiation-induced dermal fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate DFO for RIPN. Thus, 18 mice received 30Gy of fractionated XRT. After a fibrosis development interval, mice were treated with DFO injections, saline injections (Saline) or none (IR) (n = 6 per group). Longitudinal measures included footprint analysis, cold allodynia testing and monofilament testing. Immunofluorescent staining for myelination (MPZ) and axonal regeneration (GAP43) took place at the conclusion of the experiment. DFO improved motor deficits (Combined Toe Spread scores: -9.72, -12.91, -12.72 for DFO, Saline and IR, respectively). Additionally, DFO improved cold allodynia (duration ratios: 0.90, 0.70 and 0.73 for DFO, Saline and IR, respectively). Monofilament testing revealed the same trend, though not statistically significant. Additionally, DFO increased remyelination on MPZ staining (normalized myelin ratios: 0.84 DFO, 0.74 Saline, 0.72 IR) and increased axonal regeneration on GAP43 staining compared to all groups (pixel area: 3.76% DFO, 1.95% Saline, 1.94% IR, 2.09% Control). In conclusion, this murine study revealed DFO improves RIPN sensorimotor function. This is encouraging as disease-modifying treatments are limited for patients suffering from this XRT side effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.