ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Thromboembolic events in giant cell arteritis: a scoping review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a granulomatous vasculitis that can cause severe ischemic complications. GCA also faces an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). Understanding the burden and predictors of VTE in GCA is crucial to improving patient care. Materials and methods: We conducted a scoping review using PubMed. We identified studies published since August 1990 that reported VTE in adults with GCA. Eligible designs included randomized trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series with ≥5 patients. Data extraction included study characteristics, patient demographics, and VTE outcomes. Findings were synthesized qualitatively, given expected heterogeneity. Results: Out of 260 records screened, eight studies comprising 36 932 patients with GCA were included. Across studies, 1579 patients (4.3%) experienced VTE. Meta-analyses and large cohort studies consistently reported an elevated risk of VTE compared with controls, with odds ratios ranging from 1.9 to 4.1. The risk was greatest in the first year after diagnosis (relative risks up to 11), declining over time but remaining persistently elevated for at least 5 years. Associated characteristics included inpatient diagnosis, higher comorbidity burden, prior hospitalizations, thrombocytosis, and prior history of VTE, while traditional cardiovascular risk factors were not consistently associated. Mortality was higher in patients with GCA who developed VTE compared to those without. Conclusions: This review confirms that GCA confers a substantially increased risk of VTE, particularly within the first year after diagnosis. Larger prospective studies are needed to refine prediction models and guide preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.