Evidence mapPaperPMID 42254261Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Assessment of hydrosodic balance by impedancemetry in intensive care: a monocentric prospective study, the EBaHIR study.

Hugo Moiroux, Tala Salman, Julien Aniort, Rémi Andral, Edouard Dugat, Kevin Grapin, Jean Christophe Bouennec, Maxime Dumesnil, Bertrand Burel, Laure Calvet and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hugo MoirouxMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Tala SalmanMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Julien AniortDepartment of Nephrology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Rémi AndralMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Edouard DugatMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Kevin GrapinMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean Christophe BouennecMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Maxime DumesnilMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bertrand BurelMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Laure CalvetMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bertrand SouweineMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Claire DupuisMedical Intensive Care, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-3097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fluid overload (FO) is frequent in critically ill patients and is linked to adverse outcomes. Conventional assessment methods - clinical signs, body weight variation, and cumulative fluid balance (cumFB) - have limitations during prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a non-invasive technique that may provide a more accurate evaluation of hydration status. This study assessed the ability of BIA to detect FO in ICU patients compared with standard clinical and ultrasound methods. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study in a medical ICU, including adults expected to stay ≥7 days. Hydration status was monitored daily by clinical exam, ultrasound, weight change, and cumFB. From Day 3, BIA measurements [total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), intracellular water (ICW), third-space volume, ECW/TBW ratio, ECW/ICW ratio, excess volume, and phase angle] were obtained. FO was defined by BIA-derived criteria. Agreements and correlations were analyzed. Results: Twenty-one patients (median age 69.5 years; 66.7% male) underwent 88 BIA assessments. Clinical FO was present in 55.7% of cases, whereas BIA identified FO in 82.8% (excess volume >1 L). In patients without clinical signs, BIA still revealed hidden fluid excess. Weight change correlated with cumFB ( Conclusion: BIA detects subclinical FO overlooked by standard methods, supporting its integration into ICU fluid management and de-resuscitation strategies. Larger studies are needed to confirm its prognostic value.

Indexed as

bioimpedance analysisfluid overloadintensive care

Identifiers

PMID42254261
PMCPMC13236182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.