Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255115›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2026

IntegriLAB: a blockchain-enabled electronic lab notebook for reproducible neuroimaging research.

Rubaida Easmin, Mattia Veronese, Paul Allen, Giovanna Nordio, Federico Turkheimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rubaida EasminInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mattia VeroneseInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul AllenInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Giovanna NordioInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Federico TurkheimerInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of data-intensive science, managing and verifying research processes that include raw data, analysis scripts, workflows, and documentation, remains a major challenge, particularly in complex fields like neuroimaging were multiple processing and analyses stages can take place. Fragmented tools, inconsistent documentation, and poor platform integration continue to undermine reproducibility. While current Electronic Lab Notebooks (ELNs) aid organization, they often lack cross-platform interoperability, authorship certification, and immutable auditability. To address these gaps, this study proposes a novel ELN framework IntegriLAB, that consolidates traditional data, document and code repositories into a centralized, web-based system for end-to-end project tracking. As a proof of concept, our case study integrates DataLad, Overleaf and GitHub. It allows real-time monitoring across the research cycle while preserving familiar workflows. A key innovation is the use of LabTrace built on green blockchain technology to certify research activities through cryptographically signed, immutable records, ensuring data integrity and verifiable authorship with minimal environmental impact. By unifying project management, secure data handling, and blockchain-based verification, the proposed ELN advances reproducibility, fosters trust, and strengthens collaborative research practices.

Indexed as

blockchain verificationdata integrityelectronic lab notebookneuroimagingresearch reproducibility

Identifiers

PMID42255115
PMCPMC13233703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.