ArticleJournal of Appalachian health2025
Leveraging Community Health Worker's Deep Community Knowledge to Address Food and Nutrition Security in Appalachia.
Article in Journal of Appalachian health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Community health workers (CHWs) are trusted professionals in communities because of the deep understanding and cultural insights learned from their lived experiences. In Appalachia, CHWs are embedded in the community, giving them a unique understanding of how social determinants, like food and nutrition security, impact health outcomes. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the professional characteristics and knowledge of CHWs while identifying culturally sensitive practices around food insecurity. Methods: This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study used an online survey and in-depth phone interviews with CHWs in the Appalachian Region to examine their professional characteristics and knowledge on food security in their community. Quantitative surveys included a Cultural Competence Assessment (CCA) with two subscales: Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity (CAS) and Cultural Competence Behaviors (CCB). Surveys were analyzed descriptively to examine professional characteristics, while interviews underwent thematic analysis to identify community-based food and nutrition solutions. Results: Fourteen CHWs completed the online survey, and over 75% reported being able to provide guidance to families on food assistance programs. Findings from in-depth interviews highlight the challenges that families face in accessing these programs, including generational differences that affect access to home-cooked v packaged foods, as well as access to entitlement programs due to non-custodial caretaker status. Implications: The deep cultural competence among CHWs makes their partnerships a valuable community asset. Their unique position and knowledge of the community enable them to identify opportunities for community-based solutions to improve food and nutrition security in rural Appalachia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.