Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256241›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2026

Incidence and clinical outcomes of extended duration support in patients with Impella 5.5 - Analysis from the LOQI Registry.

David Kaczorowski, Vidang P Nguyen, Aasim Afzal, Scott C Silvestry, Ahmad Zeeshan, Naveena Yanamala, Ray Matthews, Rothy Chhim, Sanjeev Aggarwal, Sami I Somo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David KaczorowskiUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Venetia, PA.
Vidang P NguyenProvidence, Portland, OR.
Aasim AfzalBaylor Scott & White Health, Plano, TX.
Scott C SilvestryUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Ahmad ZeeshanAdventHealth, Orlando, FL.
Naveena YanamalaRutgers Health, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Ray MatthewsKeck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA.
Rothy ChhimJohnson & Johnson MedTech, Danvers, MA.
Sanjeev AggarwalJohnson & Johnson MedTech, Danvers, MA.
Sami I SomoJohnson & Johnson MedTech, Danvers, MA.
Gavin W HickeyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Impella 5.5 pumps are increasingly used in cardiogenic shock (CS) for extended hemodynamic support (>14 days). Rates of adverse events have not been well-characterized during longer durations of support. Therefore, we sought to define patient characteristics and adverse event rates in short versus extended duration of Impella 5.5 support (DOS). Methods: Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and serious adverse events defined as death or serious deterioration of health (Serious Adverse Event (SAE): hemolysis, stroke, renal failure, and vascular complications) were analyzed. SAE exposure adjusted event rates were compared between patients supported ≤14 days (short DOS cohort) and >14 days (extended DOS cohort). Results: Among the 2262 patients enrolled across 31 sites in the LOQI (Long-Term Outcome and Quality Impella) registry, 443 patients were supported with the Impella 5.5. Compared to the extended duration cohort, the short duration cohort were older, had a greater proportion of women, and had a higher incidence of hypertension. Event adjusted exposure rate (EAER) was significantly lower in the extended versus short DOS cohort for cumulative SAEs, (EAER: 0.0776 vs. 0.0235 events/day; p<0.001) as well as each of the individual components: hemolysis (0.011 vs. 0.0029), stroke (0.0086 vs. 0.0024), renal failure (0.0177 vs. 0.005), vascular complications (0.0124 vs. 0.0053), and bleeding (0.0235 vs. 0.0061). Conclusions: In a real-world setting, extended use of Impella 5.5 for >14 days did not increase the rate of serious adverse events and was able to provide hemodynamic support to a heterogenous group of patients presenting with cardiogenic shock with stable device performance.

Indexed as

Axial flow pumpBridge to recoveryCardiogenic ShockExtended supportImpella 5.5Long duration supportMechanical Circulatory Support

Identifiers

PMID42256241
PMCPMC13234711

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.