ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Publication Rate and Discontinuation Percentage of Registered Trials Involving Rotator Cuff Pathology.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although many clinical trials are conducted on rotator cuff tears, a significant number of patient-enrolled studies remain unpublished, resulting in potential gaps in the sharing of scientific knowledge. Purpose: To analyze the publication rate and discontinuation percentage of registered trials involving rotator cuff pathology. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A search for clinical trials was conducted in 4 different registries in a retrospective cohort study. Nontherapeutic studies, trials based on rehabilitation or anesthesia, or studies that had not completed recruitment and analysis before 2022 were excluded. The studies were classified according to their topic of interest, status in the registry, and funding. The sample size and study methods were also documented.The existence of an indexed publication in PubMed and Embase was verified, along with the final sample size included and the type of study. The corresponding authors of unpublished studies were contacted to explore the fate of the research project. The reasons for trial discontinuation were registered. Results: Of the 152 included trials, 60 (39.47%) were not published in an indexed journal and 36 (23.68%) were discontinued. Studies of biological treatments presented a greater risk of discontinuation than trials on other topics (38.18% vs 15.46%; Conclusion: Approximately 40% of the trials on rotator cuff tears were not published. Research on biological therapies showed a higher rate of discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.