ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2026
Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2025 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guidelines for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of review: 1) Provide a Canadian perspective on the 2025 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) guidelines; 2) identify challenges and nuances in applying these guidelines in Canada; 3) highlight shifts in expert practice points for Canadian care providers; 4) outline opportunities for research, knowledge translation, and quality improvement in Canada. Sources of information: The KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the management of ADPKD, as well as a survey and discussion by Canadian experts in ADPKD. Methods: The co-chairs invited stakeholders from the Canadian ADPKD community to ensure national representation, including adult and pediatric clinicians, trainees, a genetic counselor, and a patient partner with an Indigenous perspective. Members were surveyed to identify key practice points. Subgroups reviewed issues and drafted discussion topics. All members reviewed the final draft. Key Findings: The committee commented on recommendations with nuance for Canadian practitioners, especially on multidisciplinary care, challenges with genetic testing, and the use of CKD therapies like sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in ADPKD. Limitations: The committee relied on the evidence summaries produced by KDIGO and the experience and knowledge of committee members. The committee did not replicate or update the systematic reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.