Trial reportMycoses2026
Efficacy Evaluation of Luliconazole-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers in Treatment-Resistant Dermatophytosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Mycoses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDermatophytosis is a common superficial fungal infection that is increasingly complicated by terbinafine (TRB)-resistant strains, especially Trichophyton indotineae. Conventional antifungals often show limited efficacy against resistant isolates, highlighting the need for novel treatments. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nanostructured lipid carrier-loaded luliconazole (NLC-LCZ) gel in TRB-resistant dermatophytosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn a randomized, clinical trial conducted at Touba Specialty Clinic, Sari, Iran, forty-eight adults with confirmed TRB-resistant dermatophytosis were assigned to oral itraconazole (ITZ), topical luliconazole, NLC-LCZ gel, or ITZ + NLC-LCZ gel for 4 weeks (n = 12 each). The primary endpoint was complete recovery (clinical and mycological), while secondary endpoints included lesion size, itch, inflammation, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and safety.
resultsComplete recovery occurred in 83.3% of ITZ + NLC-LCZ, 75% of NLC-LCZ, 58.3% of LCZ, and 0% of ITZ alone. LCZ and NLC-LCZ had lower MIC
conclusionsThese findings indicate that NLC-LCZ enhanced antifungal efficacy and quality of life in TRB-resistant dermatophytosis, and that combination therapy with ITZ + NLC-LCZ yielded the highest recovery, representing a promising strategy against resistant infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.