Trial reportClinical and experimental nephrology2026
Effects of cilostazol on renal function, renal blood flow, and long-term prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCilostazol has antiplatelet and vasodilatory properties and may provide renoprotective and cardiovascular benefits; however, its effects in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain unclear.
methodsThis prospective pilot study enrolled 12 patients with advanced CKD due to nephrosclerosis (7 men, 5 women; mean age 65.3 ± 11.0 years). Patients were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol 200 mg/day plus aspirin 100 mg/day (Group C, n = 6) or aspirin 100 mg/day alone (Group A, n = 6). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were measured using inulin and para-aminohippuric acid clearance at baseline and after 1 year. Renal outcomes and complications were evaluated, followed by long-term observation until initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT).
resultsBaseline GFR and RPF were comparable between groups. After 1 year, GFR increased in 4 of 6 patients in Group C but declined in all patients in Group A. Mean GFR decreased significantly in Group A but not in Group C. Although estimated GFR declined in both groups, the annual rate of decline was significantly slower in Group C than in Group A (- 2.72 vs. - 3.84 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionCilostazol may slow short-term renal function decline and offer long-term cardiovascular protection in patients with advanced CKD. Further studies are needed to determine its role in preventing long-term renal deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.