Observational studyJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Patient-reported tolerability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using conscious sedation in patients with underlying depression and anxiety.
Observational study in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often performed under conscious sedation, which may increase pain and dissatisfaction. Mental health conditions may influence patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), including tolerability. This study explores the association between pre-existing anxiety and/or depression and ERCP tolerability using the validated Patient-Reported Scale for Tolerability of Endoscopic Procedure (PRO-STEP) to address this. METHODOLOGY: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data from an international observational cohort of adult patients undergoing ERCP. Pre-existing anxiety/depression were identified prior to the index procedure and the PRO-STEP questionnaire was used to evaluate peri- and post-procedure outcomes. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions examined the associations between pre-operative anxiety/depression and peri- and post-operative tolerability and patient-reported health outcomes.
resultsAmong 3,714 participants, 13% had anxiety and/or depression. The mean age of participants in the control group was 62.3 ± 17.4 years, and 49.9% were female, while in the group with depression and/or anxiety, the mean age was 60.0 ± 16.4 years and 68.3% were female (p < 0.001). Common bile duct stones were the most common indications for ERCP in both groups (41.6% of controls and 42.4% of the depression/anxiety group, p = 0.10). Patients in the depression/anxiety group reported higher rates of opioid use (23.4% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.001), cannabis use (22.8% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001), and heavy alcohol consumption (5.0% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of disposition, comorbidities, or procedural parameters. Underlying anxiety and/or depression was significantly associated with increased intra-procedural awareness score > 3 (odds ratio, OR, 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95) and discomfort score > 6 (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.23-2.43) and with post-procedural scores > 3 for abdominal pain (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.93), nausea (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.43-2.89), and distension (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.29-3.50).
conclusionsPatients with pre-existing anxiety and/or depression reported significantly worse tolerability of ERCP under conscious sedation. Although further research is needed in this area, staff in gastrointestinal endoscopy units should consider strategies aimed at improving tolerability and, consequently, satisfaction among vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.