Trial reportOccupational and environmental medicine2026
Impact of the EILA application on smoking cessation among hospital workers: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSmoking remains a major preventable cause of lung and cardiovascular disease. This randomised controlled trial evaluated EILA, a mobile application using artificial intelligence, for promoting smoking cessation among hospital workers.
methodsA randomised controlled trial was conducted. Hospital workers (n=43) were recruited from a German university hospital from May 2022 to March 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised age ≥18, Fagerström score ≥3 or 10 cigarettes per day, ownership of a suitable smartphone, motivation to quit smoking and no addiction to other psychoactive substances. Participants were randomised by sealed envelopes to EILA intervention (n=25) or a wait-list control (n=18) receiving a primary care-style intervention, with crossover after 3 months. The primary outcome was the cessation rate. Secondary outcomes comprised nicotine dependence, mental health and cardiovascular risk, all measured using validated questionnaires.
resultsAt the 6-month follow-up, the relative risk for continued smoking was reduced to 0.91 (n=51, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.2), and nicotine dependence, measured by the Fagerström Test, decreased significantly from 4.41±1.93 to 3.32±2.69 (n=19, p=0.014). PROCAM score for cardiovascular risk was reduced from 35.22±12.47 to 31.9±13.24 (n=36, p=0.008).
conclusionThe digital health application EILA was linked to increased smoking cessation rates, although without achieving statistical significance. Nevertheless, the results indicate reductions in nicotine dependence and cardiovascular risk, supporting EILA as a scalable and flexible intervention for promoting health in hospital workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.