ArticleScientific reports2026
Prevalence and a LASSO-derived prediction model for screening-positive mild cognitive impairment among older adults in Wuhan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of screening-positive mild cognitive impairment (s-MCI) and to develop a parsimonious prediction model using machine learning methods to identify high-risk older adults in Wuhan, China. A total of 2,190 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 60 years were recruited through multistage cluster sampling from 30 residential committees in 13 districts. MCI screening was conducted with the Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D). The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was employed to select predictive variables, and multiple machine learning classifiers were compared. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the best-performing model. The screening-positive rate of MCI was 35.3%. The final prediction model retained four predictors: age, occupation, sleep disorders, and literacy level. XGBoost showed slightly better discrimination than logistic regression in the validation set (AUC: 0.693 vs. 0.671). Based on SHAP values, sleep disorders, advanced age, lower education level, and farmer occupation were the most important contributors to the prediction. The burden of screening-positive MCI is considerable among older adults in Wuhan. The LASSO-derived prediction model, comprising easily obtainable variables, can serve as a practical risk-stratification tool to support targeted early screening, without implying a unique etiological role for the selected predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.