Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260521›Full record

ReviewThrombosis journal2026

Emerging strategies in venous thromboembolism: a narrative review of pharmacological innovations.

Juan Ye, Kun Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thrombosis journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan YeDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 1367 Wenyi West Road, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311121, China.
Kun HuangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 1367 Wenyi West Road, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311121, China. KunHuang@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1641-1472

Funding

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University 2023ZYHL23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality and is increasingly recognized as a chronic vascular disease. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have simplified management, clinically important limitations remain. Major bleeding still occurs in roughly 2-4% of treated patients per year and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in 10-12%, while post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after proximal DVT and persistent functional limitation after PE continue to impair quality of life. This narrative review synthesizes emerging pharmacological strategies beyond conventional anticoagulation, with emphasis on the maturity of evidence and on the distinction between thromboprophylaxis, treatment of acute VTE, secondary prevention, and adjunctive thrombus-resolution approaches. Factor XI/activated factor XI (FXI/FXIa) inhibition is the most mature bleeding-sparing platform. In orthopedic thromboprophylaxis, abelacimab, FXI antisense oligonucleotides, milvexian, and osocimab reduced postoperative venous thrombosis with low bleeding signals, but most data still come from prophylaxis rather than treatment trials. By contrast, fibrinolysis-enhancing strategies targeting α2-antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), or thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) seek to accelerate endogenous clot resolution and possibly reduce long-term disability, yet current clinical evidence remains early phase. Thrombo-inflammatory approaches targeting selectins or P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) have strong mechanistic rationale but limited direct clinical confirmation. Overall, the VTE pipeline is moving from broad suppression of coagulation toward mechanism-based strategies matched to specific clinical problems: bleeding-sparing anticoagulation, safer clot-resolution adjuncts, and therapies directed at vein wall injury. At present, FXI inhibition appears closest to clinical translation, whereas fibrinolysis-enhancing and thrombo-inflammatory approaches remain exploratory. Wider adoption will depend on phase 3 treatment outcomes, evidence in cancer and organ dysfunction, reversibility, cost-effectiveness, and integration into clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Factor XII inhibitorsFactor XI inhibitorsFibrinolysisPAI-1SelectinsThrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitorVenous thromboembolismα2-antiplasmin

Identifiers

PMID42260521
PMCPMC13474715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.