ArticleMicrobiome2026
Linking stochastic assembly to functional potential, redundancy, and trait patterns in bacterial communities.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStochastic processes shape the taxonomic composition of microbial assemblages. However, their impact on community functioning remains subject to debate, mainly due to functional redundancy. Little is known on the links between stochasticity and functional redundancy. Here, we assessed how stochastic assembly influences redundancy, functional potential, and trait patterns in twenty parallel lake-water bacterial communities enriched under originally identical conditions. Using gene- and genome-resolved metagenomics, we tested whether incomplete dispersal of genes required for cellobiose uptake and processing-"functional dispersal limitation"-explained variation in cellobiose use.
resultsSeveral communities were composed of genomes that held the required genes but these communities did not utilize cellobiose, rejecting the notion of "functional dispersal limitation." We quantified redundancy across major functional categories such as signaling, regulation, and transport. Functional redundancy reflected the stochastic assembly from the total set of genomes. It was lower within than between communities, likely reflecting limiting similarity vs. habitat-driven functional convergence. Category-resolved patterns of functional dissimilarity were conserved across various diversity scales and even across randomly sampled sets of 28,000 bacterial genomes from the Genome Taxonomy Database. Among these categories, functions mediating environmental and microbe-to-microbe interactions and genetic information processing had highest and lowest dissimilarity, respectively. Aquatic bacteria showed the greatest differentiation across most categories.
conclusionsStochastic assembly of bacterial communities shaped the functional trait distribution. Functional redundancy inferred from the metagenomes largely reflected the trait patterns of the total set of MAGs. Functional redundancy and dissimilarity varied according to functional category. Comparison with a null model constructed from genomes of the GTDB allowed us to identify functional selection with various strengths according to the functions. While stochasticity diversified community composition, functional patterns remained conserved, reflecting shared ecological and evolutionary constraints tempered by habitat. Hence, using null models as a reference is important to interpret functional redundancy and may provide a more accurate understanding of how stochastic assembly and ecological constraints shape community-level functional organization. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.