SynthesisMedicine2026
Safety and efficacy of lorundrostat, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that lorundrostat, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, may be effective in managing uncontrolled hypertension (HTN). Currently, no systematic review or meta-analysis (SR/MA) has assessed the safety and efficacy of the drug in such clinical conditions; this SR/MA aims to fill that knowledge gap.
methodsElectronic databases and registers were searched from inception to June 30, 2025, for RCTs involving lorundrostat in the intervention arm and placebo in the control arm in individuals with uncontrolled HTN. The primary outcome was lorundrostat safety; additional outcome was its efficacy in lowering blood pressure (BP). Meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan web with random-effects models, presenting results as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsThree low-bias RCTs with 1568 subjects were included. Over 6-12 weeks, lorundrostat (50 mg: RR 1.4 [1.23, 1.63]; 100 mg: RR 1.49 [1.29, 1.72]) increased risks of any adverse events (AEs), but not serious AEs, compared to placebo. Lorundrostat at both doses increased the risk of symptomatic hypotension. The lorundrostat group experienced a larger decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate and an increase in serum potassium levels. Lorundrostat 50 mg lowered office systolic (MD -11.11 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (MD -3.87 mm Hg) more than placebo, but not 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP. Lorundrostat 100 mg lowered office systolic (MD -8.09 mm Hg) and 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (MD -7.18 mm Hg) more than placebo, but did not affect office diastolic BP.
conclusionLorundrostat effectively manages uncontrolled HTN but increases the risk of some AEs. More RCTs involving diverse populations are needed to improve clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.