ArticlePediatric pulmonology2026
Clinical Use of Home Spirometry in Children With Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Care Professionals' Estimation of Home Spirometry Use Among People With Cystic Fibrosis: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of home spirometry (HSPIR) has increased in pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) care, but how it has been used clinically and its impact on clinical care have not been described. The purpose of this study was to address this knowledge gap through a secondary analysis of data from a HSPIR quality improvement project to characterize clinical use of HSPIR in children with CF (CwCF).
methodsHSPIR devices were distributed to 161 CwCF (age ≥ 5 years) across three CF centers. Remote encounters were reviewed to identify HSPIR use from July 2023 to February 2025. Data collected included the clinical indication for testing and its impact on clinical decision making. Differences between HSPIR users and non-users were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum, Pearson's chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests as appropriate, and descriptive statistics were used to characterize clinical HSPIR use.
resultsAmong 161 CwCF who were provided HSPIR devices, 50 (31%) used their HSPIR a total of 107 times and submitted tracking forms to their care teams over 20 months. There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between HSPIR users and non-users. The most common reasons for HSPIR use were clinic follow-ups (44%) and sick calls (33%), with clinicians reporting that HSPIR data informed clinical decisions in 72% of encounters. In 41% of remote clinical encounters, we identified a missed opportunity for using HSPIR.
conclusionIn patients and families motivated to use HSPIR, its use avoided the need to return to the clinic for follow-up spirometry and influenced clinical decision making, suggesting that HSPIR can be a useful clinical tool. The overall low uptake of HSPIR highlights the need for further research to address patient and clinician barriers to its use. The impact of HSPIR on long-term CF outcomes also requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.