Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42261191›Full record

ArticlePediatric pulmonology2026

Clinical Use of Home Spirometry in Children With Cystic Fibrosis.

Lucy Tan, Andrew Borowiec, James A Reed, Mark Rath, Reid Masi, Laura Bennett, Don B Sanders, Daniel J Weiner, Clement L Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucy TanDivision of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0556-2924
Andrew BorowiecDivision of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
James A ReedDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mark RathDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Reid MasiDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura BennettDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Don B SandersDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Daniel J WeinerDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-1961
Clement L RenDivision of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-0644

Funding

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation TAN24B20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of home spirometry (HSPIR) has increased in pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) care, but how it has been used clinically and its impact on clinical care have not been described. The purpose of this study was to address this knowledge gap through a secondary analysis of data from a HSPIR quality improvement project to characterize clinical use of HSPIR in children with CF (CwCF).

methodsHSPIR devices were distributed to 161 CwCF (age ≥ 5 years) across three CF centers. Remote encounters were reviewed to identify HSPIR use from July 2023 to February 2025. Data collected included the clinical indication for testing and its impact on clinical decision making. Differences between HSPIR users and non-users were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum, Pearson's chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests as appropriate, and descriptive statistics were used to characterize clinical HSPIR use.

resultsAmong 161 CwCF who were provided HSPIR devices, 50 (31%) used their HSPIR a total of 107 times and submitted tracking forms to their care teams over 20 months. There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between HSPIR users and non-users. The most common reasons for HSPIR use were clinic follow-ups (44%) and sick calls (33%), with clinicians reporting that HSPIR data informed clinical decisions in 72% of encounters. In 41% of remote clinical encounters, we identified a missed opportunity for using HSPIR.

conclusionIn patients and families motivated to use HSPIR, its use avoided the need to return to the clinic for follow-up spirometry and influenced clinical decision making, suggesting that HSPIR can be a useful clinical tool. The overall low uptake of HSPIR highlights the need for further research to address patient and clinician barriers to its use. The impact of HSPIR on long-term CF outcomes also requires further study.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisHome Care ServicesSpirometryAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID42261191
PMCPMC13247608

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.