ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Impact of Time of Day on Dry Eye Disease: Findings from a Large Dry Eye Clinic Cohort.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous research on the influence of time of day on dry eye disease (DED) symptoms and tear film characteristics has yielded inconsistent results, despite frequent reports of diurnal fluctuation in patient-reported symptoms. This study aimed to clarify these temporal patterns by evaluating both subjective and objective measures of DED in a large clinical cohort. Methods: A total of 1044 patients from a Norwegian dry eye clinic were assessed between September 2021 and December 2023. Associations between time of day and both subjective symptom scores and objective clinical parameters were evaluated using Pearson correlation, while diurnal rhythmicity was assessed using single-component cosinor analysis with a fixed 24-hour period. Results: Patients reported increased symptom severity in the morning and evening. However, analyses demonstrated statistically significant but clinically negligible correlations between time of day and all measured objective tear film parameters. No meaningful diurnal variation was identified in quantitative clinical metrics. Discussion: These findings reveal a persistent disconnect between subjective symptom patterns and objective clinical measures in DED. The lack of clinically meaningful diurnal variation in tear film parameters suggests that time of day may have limited relevance for objective assessment, while symptom variability may be driven by factors not captured by standard clinical testing. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying this discrepancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.