ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026
Sensory Reactivity in Autism: Integrating Behavioural, Affective, Physiological, and Neural Dimensions.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe goal of this paper is to synthesise recent research on sensory reactivity differences in autism across the lifespan, using He et al.'s sensory taxonomy as an organising framework. The review aims to address how behavioural, affective, perceptual, physiological, and neural levels of processing contribute to sensory reactivity differences, and how these differences relate to broader outcomes such as mental health, adaptive functioning, and quality of life. RECENT
findingsAcross behavioural studies, autistic youth show elevated and variable sensory responsivity, with hypersensitivity predicting internalising symptoms and sensory seeking linked to externalising behaviours. Affective reactivity is consistently elevated across cultures, associated with anxiety and caregiver stress, and sensory seeking may function as a coping mechanism. Psychophysical research reveals domain‑specific perceptual differences-such as reduced tactile adaptation, altered motion noise exclusion, and enhanced pitch discrimination-rather than overarching hyper‑ or hyposensitivity. These perceptual findings often show limited correspondence with questionnaire‑based measures. Physiologically, autonomic dysregulation is implicated, or pharmacological approaches show emerging promise. Neuroimaging evidence highlights excitation-inhibition imbalance and altered connectivity, including dissociations between exogenous and endogenous networks in sensory‑reactive autistic children. Across multiple levels of processing, sensory reactivity differences in autism are robust, heterogeneous, and meaningfully linked to mental health and daily functioning. Key conclusions include: • Sensory hyperreactivity predicts internalising challenges, while sensory seeking may reflect regulatory strategies. • Perceptual differences are domain‑specific • Physiological and neural evidence converges on autonomic dysregulation and differences in connectivity patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.