ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Multi-omics and machine learning integration of diverse cell death pathways optimize risk stratification and inform drug therapy in Wilms tumor.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite significant improvements in the overall survival of Wilms tumor (WT), a subset of patients still experiences poor outcomes. Programmed cell death (PCD) pathways are pivotal in cancer progression. A deeper understanding of their roles in WT is crucial for harnessing these mechanisms to optimize risk stratification.
methodsKey tumor-associated genes were identified through limma differential analysis and WGCNA, and subsequently integrated with 12 distinct PCD patterns. TARGET-WT transcriptomic data was divided into training and validation sets to construct and validate a risk stratification model. It was subsequently integrated with clinical information to build a comprehensive prediction model. Immune infiltration and drug sensitivity analyses were performed. External validation was performed using scRNA-seq data from GSE200256.
resultsKey tumor-associated genes were enriched in multiple PCD pathways. The risk stratification model was constructed using 4 genes selected via the machine learning algorithm, stratifying the cohort into high- and low-risk groups. In the overall WT cohort, the high-risk group exhibited worse prognosis, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values of 0.820, 0.721, and 0.728, respectively. DCA demonstrated the superior predictive accuracy of the comprehensive prediction model. The high-risk group showed lower infiltration of TH17 cells and increased sensitivity to paclitaxel and sorafenib. Finally, the expression landscape of hub genes was validated in the single-cell dataset.
conclusionThese results highlight a critical role for PCD genes in the progression and immune regulation of WT. Targeting these genes offers a promising avenue for improving clinical management of patients identified as high-risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.