Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42263029›Full record

ArticlePublic health genomics2026

Adolescent and Young Adult Perspectives on Receiving Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Results in a Prospective Genomic Screening Clinical Trial.

Jessica A Sinclair, Emma C Donigan, Cara L Barnett, Erin M Miller, Melanie F Myers, Michelle L McGowan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica A SinclairDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Emma C DoniganMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Cara L BarnettDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Erin M MillerDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Melanie F MyersDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Michelle L McGowanDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, mcgowan.michelle2@mayo.edu.

Funding

Engaging adolescents in decisions about return of genomic research resultsR01HG010166 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGOWAN, MICHELLE L, MYERS, MELANIE F · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProfessional societies recommend pediatric genetic testing only when results may impact medical management in childhood. However, with increasing access to genetic information in various settings, young people's responses to learning pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) genetic results remain understudied.

methodsThe Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results clinical trial enrolled 483 adolescents and young adults (ages 13-21 years) who made decisions about whether to undergo prospective genomic screening to learn their personal results related to 32 sets of treatable, preventable, and adult-onset conditions and carrier traits. Participants (n = 15) who received P/LP results were invited to participate in an interview at least 3 months after receiving their results.

resultsEleven individuals (ages 14-19 years) participated in an interview. Most interviewees accurately recalled their P/LP results and reported satisfaction with learning personal genetic information, despite experiencing short-lived anxiety and confusion. While participants had knowledge of relevant risk reduction and screening measures, most viewed their genetic test results as a future consideration. Several participants' family members underwent cascade testing after learning the young person's results. Reactions to or risk-reducing behaviors taken since learning results did not differ between disease categories associated with the result.

conclusionIn support of a growing body of empirical research engaging young people in genetic testing decisions and outcomes, our findings suggest that young people who choose to learn genetic information about themselves understand the implications and potential actionability of P/LP results and actively incorporate results into their and their family members' lives.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleGenomicsHumansMaleProspective StudiesReturn of Individual Research ResultsYoung AdultAdolescents and young adultsGenetic testingPathogenic results

Identifiers

PMID42263029
PMCPMC13367749

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.