ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
STR1DE: A Near-Peer Approach to FY1 Teaching.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUK Foundation Year 1 doctors (FY1s) undergo 30 h of core teaching annually to supplement clinical experiential learning. Previous weekly hour-long teaching at our institution was unpopular due to curriculum issues, difficulty in attending and focusing on teaching, and an overuse of lectures. This prompted the development of STR1DE-Simulation, Teaching and Reflection for FY1 Development and Education-which aimed to improve FY1s' satisfaction with a new teaching programme. APPROACH: STR1DE comprises six full-day sessions per year, each repeated six times (~12 participants per day). Competitively appointed and specifically trained near-peer teaching fellows design and deliver content. The curriculum is adapted in response to FY1s' feedback. Interactive educational techniques, including simulation, are used. Clinically relevant topics are prioritised while integrating core requirements from the Foundation Programme Curriculum. EVALUATION: STR1DE was attended by 168 FY1s over 3 years. Anonymised feedback forms were completed after each session. Quantitative data consistently showed high satisfaction (mean rating > 4.8/5 per session). The full-day format was preferred by 99.3% (N = 149). Qualitative feedback was collected via open-ended questions on the days' strengths and weaknesses. Thematic analysis showed that (1) the full-day approach, (2) the near-peer faculty and (3) the relevant and co-designed curriculum were key drivers of the positive quantitative feedback. IMPLICATIONS: STR1DE demonstrates that a full-day teaching programme, designed and delivered by near-peer teaching fellows, can be highly valued. Stakeholder engagement, learner involvement in curriculum development and creating a positive, collaborative learning culture are vital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.