ArticleRMD open2026
Safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: a multicentre French-Italian study.
Article in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTocilizumab (TCZ) has shown beneficial effects on interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We aimed to assess the real-life safety and effectiveness of TCZ on several SSc-related domains using data from a French-Italian multicentre cohort.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with SSc treated with TCZ across 15 referral centres. The following clinical data were collected at 12 months before TCZ initiation, at baseline and at 12 and 24 months of treatment: modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), pulmonary function tests, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C reactive protein, digital ulcers and cardiac biomarkers. ILD progression was defined as a decline ≥5 in %predicted forced vital capacity (%pFVC) over 12±3 months.
results197 patients were included (88% female; median age 57 years; median disease duration 9 years); 67% were antitopoisomerase I positive. TCZ monotherapy was used in 29% of cases, methotrexate was the most frequent combined treatment (35%). In SSc-associated ILD, %pFVC declined significantly from -12 months to baseline (81% to 77%; p=0.003). On TCZ introduction, %pFVC stabilised and the proportion of progressors declined from 43% to 24% (p=0.015). Among diffuse cutaneous patients, mRSS decreased significantly at 12 and 24 months. Digital ulcers, arthritis activity and cardiac biomarkers also improved. Infections were the most frequent adverse events (22.8%). TCZ was discontinued in 32% of patients, mainly for inefficacy. Pulmonary arterial hypertension and older age predicted TCZ failure, whereas elevated CRP predicted better response.
conclusionsIn this large real-life cohort, TCZ was safe and associated with consistent benefits across different domains, supporting its role as a potential disease-modifying treatment in selected patients with SSc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.