ArticleScientific reports2026
Masked autoencoder pretraining for peripheral nerve segmentation in ultrasound images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite recent advances in medical image segmentation, deep learning applications in musculoskeletal ultrasound remain limited by small labeled datasets and a narrow clinical focus. Most existing work centers on the median nerve, leaving other clinically relevant peripheral nerves understudied. This study explores masked autoencoder (MAE) pretraining as a scalable approach to overcome data scarcity in peripheral nerve segmentation. A dataset of 10,603 ultrasound images across eight nerves was constructed, spanning over 1,500 patients with normal nerve conduction studies. A SegFormer-based encoder was pretrained on unlabeled ultrasound images using MAE and subsequently fine-tuned on nerve-specific segmentation tasks. Pretraining was applied per cross-validation fold to prevent data leakage. Compared to randomly initialized baselines, MAE-pretrained models achieved consistent performance gains across all nerves. Improvements were most pronounced for low-resource targets such as the sural (0.144 → 0.399 Dice) and lateral femoral cutaneous (0.280 → 0.550 Dice) nerves. Nerves with more abundant training data, like the median (0.890 → 0.897 Dice) and ulnar (0.862 → 0.869 Dice), showed only marginal improvements. These findings indicate that MAE pretraining particularly strengthens feature extraction for small, difficult-to-label structures in ultrasound segmentation. This underscores the potential of self-supervised learning to ease annotation demands and support the development of more comprehensive clinical AI tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.