ArticleScientific reports2026
An information-theoretic evaluation framework for CNN-LSTM-based Alzheimer's disease classification from structural MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important because of its progressive impact on cognitive function. This study presents a CNN-LSTM-based framework for three-class AD classification from structural MRI, with the primary contribution being a post-hoc information-theoretic evaluation strategy rather than a new network architecture. Experiments were conducted using 827 ADNI subjects, including normal controls (NC: 340), mild cognitive impairment (MCI: 307), and AD (180). To mitigate data scarcity and improve training diversity, GAN-based augmentation was applied only to the training data, while validation and test subjects were kept separate. In addition to conventional metrics, trained models were evaluated using Renyi mutual information, Renyi divergence, and Henze-Penrose divergence to quantify information preservation, representation stability, and distributional alignment. Under a subject-level evaluation protocol, the CNN-LSTM model achieved 96.7% accuracy and outperformed evaluated benchmark architectures under the same protocol. The information-theoretic measures provided complementary evidence for comparing model behavior beyond accuracy, particularly regarding information retention and output-distribution alignment. Overall, the findings suggest that post-hoc information-theoretic analysis can support more transparent assessment of MRI-based AD classification models. However, external validation on independent multi-center datasets is required before clinical deployment can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.