ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Deep learning approach for probabilistic pulmonary function estimation from chest X-ray and peak expiratory flow rate.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning approach for probabilistic pulmonary function estimation from chest X-ray and peak expiratory flow rate.Communications medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpirometry remains the gold standard for assessing pulmonary function. Deep learning models have demonstrated potential for estimating measurements from chest X-rays (CXR). We aim to effectively address anatomical variability and integrate probabilistic reasoning to enhance estimation reliability near diagnostic thresholds.
methodsWe developed a probabilistic machine learning framework to estimate the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the forced vital capacity (FVC) as measured through spirometry. Estimations use morphologically regularized CXRs and anthropometric-normalized peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) as proxy for volumetric information unavailable in imaging. By estimating FEV1 and FVC z-scores, we decouple appearance from anatomic variability. We demonstrate our method on a multi-national cohort of pulmonary tuberculosis patients exhibiting diverse structural abnormalities and ventilatory impairments.
resultsUsing ensembles of neural networks, we analyze 982 CXR and spirometry pairs from 568 individuals. The best model achieves an area under curve (AUC) of 0.879 (FEV1; 99%CI 0.876, 0.881) and 0.853 (FVC; 99%CI 0.850, 0.856) in identifying moderate or severe lung-function impairment on a previously unseen test-set, signifying an AUC improvement of 0.144 (FEV1) and 0.118 (FVC) over previous methods. When allowing up to 10% of samples to remain unclassified due to uncertainty, AUC further rises to 0.894 (0.891, 0.896) and 0.857 (0.854, 0.860), respectively. Our method performs robustly across diverse impairment types and CXR pathologies.
conclusionsOur study shows that decoupling anatomical variability from functional assessment improves lung function estimation. Incorporation of probabilistic modeling improved diagnostic reliability around a decision threshold. Therefore, our system offers a promising approach to practical lung function estimation in settings where spirometry is unavailable.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.