Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265609›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Repeatability and reproducibility of APT and GluCEST imaging at 5 T: phantom validation and clinical evaluation in patients with brain tumors.

Tong Chen, Ling Wang, Tianjun Wang, Chao Zheng, Zhiwei Qin, Wu Cai, Guangzheng Li, Chunhong Hu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tong Chen *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road 899, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Ling Wang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road 899, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Tianjun WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road 899, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Chao ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road 899, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Zhiwei QinMR Collaborative Innovation Department, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201807, China.
Wu CaiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Sanxiang Road 1055, 215000, Suzhou, China.
Guangzheng LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road 899, Suzhou, 215000, China. ligz_@126.com.
Chunhong HuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road 899, Suzhou, 215000, China. hch5305@163.com.

Funding

Jiangsu Province Capability Improvement Project through Science,Technology and Education JSDW202242Suzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging SZS2024032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of amide proton transfer (APT) and glutamate chemical exchange saturation transfer (GluCEST) imaging at 5 T and to investigate their clinical value in patients with brain tumors.

methodsPhantom experiments under varying pH conditions and bovine serum albumin (BSA) concentrations were performed to assess the within-session repeatability, between-session and between-day reproducibility of APT and GluCEST measurements using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), mean absolute difference, coefficient of repeatability (CoR) and coefficient of variation (CV). In vivo APT and GluCEST imaging was performed in 96 patients with brain tumors. Intra- and inter-observer agreements of APTmean and GluCESTmean measurements were evaluated using ICCs and Bland-Altman analysis across tumor, peritumoral edema, and normal brain tissue regions. Quantitative tumor-region APT and GluCEST metrics (APT/GluCESTmean, APT/GluCEST difference, and APT/GluCEST change ratio) were compared among major tumor subtypes using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons using Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance for differentiating high-grade gliomas from low-grade gliomas.

resultsIn phantom studies, both APT and GluCEST demonstrated robust repeatability and reproducibility with high ICCs (> 0.96) and low mean absolute difference, CoR and CV. Both APT and GluCEST-weighted signals showed nonlinear pH-dependent changes and increased with higher BSA concentrations. In patients, intra- and inter-observer agreements were excellent for APTmean and GluCESTmean in tumor, peritumoral edema, and normal brain regions (ICCs > 0.93). Tumor and peritumoral edema regions showed higher APT and GluCEST values than normal brain tissue (p < 0.05). After multiple-comparison correction, high-grade gliomas showed significantly higher APTmean, APT difference, GluCESTmean, GluCEST difference and GluCEST change ratio than low-grade gliomas. GluCEST-derived metrics showed favorable performance for glioma grading, with GluCEST change ratio achieving the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846, followed by GluCEST difference (AUC = 0.838) and GluCESTmean (AUC = 0.836).

conclusionAPT and GluCEST imaging at 5 T showed excellent repeatability and reproducibility in phantom experiments and robust measurement agreement in patients with brain tumors. APT and GluCEST measurements demonstrated subtype-related differences, and GluCEST-derived metrics showed favorable performance for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleGlutamic AcidHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingProtonsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveGlutamic AcidProtons5 TAmide proton transferBrain tumorsGlioma gradingGlutamate chemical exchange saturation transferRepeatabilityReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID42265609
PMCPMC13474971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.