Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265697›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2026

Feasibility and acceptability of a rural palliative care intervention for patients with heart failure (RuPAL-HF).

Francesca X Piccolo, Eric C Anderson, Hanna Gutow, Claire M Johnson, Michelle D Nevers, Susan DeSanto-Madeya, Rebecca N Hutchinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca X PiccoloMaineHealth Institute for Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Population Health and Research, Westbrook, ME, USA.
Eric C AndersonMaineHealth Institute for Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Population Health and Research, Westbrook, ME, USA.
Hanna GutowTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Claire M JohnsonTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle D NeversCenter for Health Improvement, Healthy Aging, MaineHealth, Portland, ME, USA.
Susan DeSanto-MadeyaCollege of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA.
Rebecca N HutchinsonMaineHealth Institute for Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Population Health and Research, Westbrook, ME, USA. becca.hutchinson@mainehealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with heart failure (HF) have unmet palliative care (PC) needs, particularly in rural areas. Collaborative care models may meet these needs by connecting primary care teams with urban palliative care specialists. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Rural Palliative Care for Patients with Heart Failure (RuPAL-HF) intervention.

methodsWe recruited patients with HF from a rural Maine primary care clinic. A complex care team embedded in primary care was trained in PC. Specialty PC clinicians supported the team through weekly collaborative care meetings, providing coaching and case-specific guidance. Specialty palliative care clinicians also provided tele-PC when needed. Feasibility was assessed via recruitment, referral-to-completion rates, completion of advance care planning and surveys as well as collaborative care meeting attendance. Acceptability was assessed using qualitative methods through semi-structured interviews with patients, clinicians, and complex care team members.

resultsThe intervention was feasible and acceptable to patients, clinicians, and complex care team members. 31 patients were approached, 13 enrolled, and 12 (92.3%) completed all intervention components. All patients completed a serious illness conversation with the complex care team and 11 (84.6%) with the specialty PC physician. 12 patients (92.3%) completed an advance directive and 8 (61.5%) a Portable Medical Orders Form. Patients reported that goals-of-care conversations were not overly emotionally challenging, and they valued the telehealth option. All care team members attended trainings, completed surveys, and participated in ≥90% of collaborative care meetings. Complex care team members reported increased confidence and skills after trainings.

conclusionThe RuPAL-HF intervention was feasible and acceptable for patients, clinicians, and complex care team members. Telehealth appeared feasible as a mechanism to support access to specialty PC. Further research is needed to evaluate this intervention in other rural sites, care teams, and health conditions.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePalliative CarePatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaineMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesAcceptabilityCollaborative care modelComplex care teamFeasibilityHeart failurePalliative careRural health

Identifiers

PMID42265697
PMCPMC13474978

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.