ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
The impact of emergency intubation on surgical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection AADA (DeBakey I). Is a prompt treatment justified?
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn acute aortic dissection Stanford type A (AADA) is a life-threatening disease and one of the urgent emergencies in cardiovascular surgery. Furthermore, mortality increases when further risk factors like malperfusion, cardiac tamponade or preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) occur. This study retrospectively evaluates the impact of emergency intubation, performed prior to hospital admission, on early and long-term surgical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection Stanford type A (AADA, DeBakey Type I).
methodsBetween January 2000 and January 2018, 430 patients received aortic surgery due to an acute aortic dissection type A (DeBakey Type I) at our tertiary referral hospital. These patients were included in this study. The primary objective was to compare 30-day mortality and long-term survival between intubated and non-intubated AADA patients, while also analyzing differences in preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications. A retrospective analysis with follow-up was conducted.
resultsA minority (n = 55; 12.79%) of the entire cohort (n = 430) presented themselves in an intubated status and were assigned to Group A, whereas 375 patients were not intubated prior to surgery (Group B). The median age of the entire cohort of 430 patients was 63.7 years and 67.2% patients were male. Group A had a significantly higher number of patients with pericardial tamponade (Group A 58.2%; Group B: 34.7%) and an increased demand for mechanical resuscitation due to pulseless electrical activity (Group A: 29.1%; Group B: 5.9%). Preoperative malperfusion (Group A: 43.6%; Group B: 29.6%; p: 0.036) occurred significantly more often in the intubated cohort. Furthermore, Group A showed a higher number of supra-aortic artery dissections as well as neurological symptoms. The extent of the surgical treatment was comparable for both intubated and non-intubated patients. A total of 38.2% of the intubated AADA patients did not survive the first 30 days after surgery (Group A: 38.2%; Group B: 19.5%; p: 0.002).
conclusionPrehospital intubated AADA patients present severe risk factors for early mortality, including pericardial tamponade, severe malperfusion and preoperative resuscitation. Despite the particularly early mortality rate of 40%, the majority of patients benefitted from prompt surgical treatment. Furthermore, the study presents an acceptable long-term outcome after surviving the initial first year after treatment. We therefore recommend that emergent aortic repair should be offered to intubated patients with AADA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.