Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265867›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Dose Recommendations for Drugs in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis (The ALIVe Study): Protocol for a Multiphase Validation and Consensus Study.

Katharina Karsten Dafonte, Philipp Lutz, Christian Jansen, Christian P Strassburg, Robert Németh, Gunther Hartmann, Ulrich Jaehde, Martin Coenen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katharina Karsten DafonteInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany, 49 22828714036.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-8860
Philipp LutzDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-200X
Christian JansenDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-9644
Christian P StrassburgDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7870-5359
Robert NémethInstitute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-0569-0004
Gunther HartmannInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany, 49 22828714036.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-2018
Ulrich JaehdeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2493-7370
Martin CoenenInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany, 49 22828714036.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-4409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liver cirrhosis leads to an impaired liver function with reduced metabolic capacity, which affects the pharmacokinetics of several drugs, requiring dose adjustments. Although limited literature provides guidance on appropriate administration of drugs in cirrhosis, no guidelines currently exist for dose selection or adjustment. Objective: The objective of this study is to provide guidance on the selection, dosing, and appropriate use of drugs in patients with liver cirrhosis and evaluate the clinical application of these recommendations. Methods: Three steps are planned to establish dose recommendations for patients with liver cirrhosis. First, a systematic literature search will be conducted to identify specific recommendations for drug selection and dosing in cirrhosis, and the literature will be assessed for reporting quality and evidence level. Subsequently, the resulting recommendations will undergo an internal preassessment procedure for relevance of the covered drugs with regard to availability, the clinical impact of adverse drug reactions, the frequency of use, and the expected benefit of dose adjustment. Second, a modified Delphi procedure will be conducted to (1) analyze the clinical handling of the identified drugs by experts in clinical practice in a first round and (2) parse changes resulting from the inclusion of medication-related information and further harmonize differing dose recommendations in a second round. Finally, the adopted dose recommendations will be implemented in a clinical study involving patients with liver cirrhosis to analyze the impact of the recommendations on patient safety. Results: The planned clinical validation phase started in January 2025 and is currently underway. As of May 2026, 121 patients have been enrolled. Statistical analyses will be conducted in accordance with the predefined analysis plan. Findings from the literature review, the Delphi consensus process, and the clinical validation phase will be reported in subsequent publications. Final study results and data analysis are anticipated in August 2026. Conclusions: This protocol outlines a structured approach combining a systematic literature review of specific dose recommendations in patients with cirrhosis that integrates a quality assessment to ensure the inclusion of only high-quality evidence, expert opinions through a Delphi consensus aligning differing recommendations, and a clinical validation to support safer drug therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Indexed as

Liver CirrhosisConsensusDelphi TechniqueDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansResearch DesignChild-Pugh classificationdose adjustmentdrug recommendationsdrug safetydrug selectionliver cirrhosismedication safetypharmacistpharmacist-led intervention

Identifiers

PMID42265867
PMCPMC13249594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.