Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266274›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

The application of tissue engineering in cartilage regeneration: technological advances and future challenges.

Hongyu Zhang, Jingwei Feng, Jiajun Zhi, Yiwen Deng, Ronghua Zou, Liulin Fu, Haiyue Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongyu ZhangPlastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jingwei FengPlastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiajun ZhiPlastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yiwen DengPlastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ronghua ZouPeople's Hospital of Ningxiang City, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Liulin FuPeople's Hospital of Ningxiang City, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Haiyue JiangPlastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cartilage tissue, owing to its avascular, aneural, and alymphatic nature, possesses a highly limited capacity for self-repair. Damage caused by trauma, degenerative diseases, or congenital malformations seldom heals spontaneously, constituting a long-standing clinical challenge in orthopedic and plastic surgery. Tissue engineering offers a promising strategy for cartilage regeneration by combining seed cells, biomaterial scaffolds, and bioactive molecules to construct substitutes that recapitulate the structure and function of native cartilage. The evolution of biomaterials and scaffold design is traced from natural and synthetic polymers to decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM), nanocomposite scaffolds, and stimuli-responsive hydrogel systems. Advances in biomanufacturing are examined in parallel, with particular attention to the role of 3D/4D bioprinting in fabricating architecturally complex tissue constructs, as well as the contributions of electrospinning and cell sheet engineering. Moving beyond materials and fabrication, the ongoing transition from cell-based regeneration toward cell-free approaches, particularly exosome-mediated endogenous repair and organoid-based micro-tissue construction, is discussed, alongside biomimetic design strategies such as gradient scaffolds, physically responsive scaffolds, and vascular-immune microenvironment regulation. Critical barriers to clinical translation are also identified, including manufacturing costs, process standardization, long-term efficacy and safety validation, patient stratification, and regulatory pathways. The review concludes by outlining future directions such as multi-technology convergence, endogenous regeneration strategies, and the development of off-the-shelf products, with the aim of providing a systematic reference for research and clinical translation in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

biomanufacturingbiomaterial scaffoldscartilage regenerationcell-free therapyclinical translationregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID42266274
PMCPMC13243408

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.