Evidence mapPaperPMID 42266580Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026

Transdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology training integrates women's and children's health with life-course brain capital strategies: a narrative review.

Mark S Scher, Shazia Adalat, Harris Eyre, Michael E Msall, Sharon L Ramey, Craig T Ramey, Ana Cristancho, Anastasiya Markvarde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark S ScherDepartments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Shazia AdalatEvelina London's Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Harris EyreBrain Capital Alliance, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Michael E MsallDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Sharon L RameyFralin Biomedical Research Institute (FBRI), Roanoke, VA, United States.
Craig T RameyFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Ana CristanchoDivision of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Anastasiya MarkvardeIndependent Women's Health and Innovation Expert, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological and mental health disorders affect over one-third of the global population. Healthcare systems continue to treat maternal brain health and neurodevelopment as separate domains. Critical intervention windows continue to be missed before and during the first 1,000 days after conception. Current fetal-neonatal neurology training reflects healthcare fragmentation. Specialty-siloed education impedes integrative critical thinking that more successfully capitalizes on pre-conception and gestational neuroprotective opportunities. This narrative review presents perspectives that argue for a transdisciplinary approach among stakeholders that advances life-course brain healthcare. Integrative women's and children's health, the developmental origins of health and disease, cultural neuroscience, and brain health capital frameworks collectively contribute to an educational, practice and research model. This methodology more productively addresses public health priorities to offer equitable global brain health care based on knowledge of intersectionality. We propose that every pregnancy represents a brain health intervention opportunity. Healthcare bundles have been defined as a set of three to five evidence-based interventions to assess the quality and outcome of medical care choices. Equity-informed brain care bundles similarly can be developed to assess proactive and reactive neuroprotective intervention outcomes. Gene-environment interactions will influence the dynamic neural exposome across each person's lifespan. More effective therapeutic options can shift intergenerational neurodevelopmental trajectories to improve neurologic and mental health for entire communities. Combining biological, social, and structural determinants determine the direction of vulnerability or resilience pathways based on time-sensitive shared healthcare decisions. Two clinical vignettes ground this theoretical framework with fetal-neonatal neurology practice experiences. Emphasis on fragmented care, limited genomic screening, structural inequity, and uncorrected environmental exposures diminish preventable neurological and maternal outcomes across generations. We propose five implementation recommendations: dismantle structural barriers to integrate care; redesign training around transdisciplinary competency frameworks; realign payment structures to incentivize coordinated care; reorient research priorities with integrated care models; and develop measurable metrics of integrated maternal-child brain health. Artificial intelligence-assisted monitoring and learning health system platforms offer infrastructural elements to enable equitable intervention scaling across diverse clinical settings. Implementation of this framework across each lifespan will reduce intergenerational burdens of neurological and mental health disorders to sustain global brain health equity.

Indexed as

cultural neurosciencefetal-neonatal neurologyintegrative woman’s-children’s healthneural exposomeneurologic-mental health disordersneuroplasticitytransdisciplinary care

Identifiers

PMID42266580
PMCPMC13243101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.