ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Unmet supportive care needs among head and neck cancer survivors in China: multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Survival after head and neck cancer treatment has improved, shifting attention toward survivorship quality and post-treatment service gaps. Evidence from China that quantifies unmet supportive care needs using standardized instruments across multiple regions remains limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study in three tertiary hospitals in East, Middle, and Southwest China. Adults with histologically confirmed head and neck cancer were recruited during routine follow-up 3 to 24 months after curative-intent treatment. Supportive care needs were assessed with the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34) and the head and neck module (SCNS-HNC), and head and neck-related quality of life was measured with University of Washington Quality of Life version 4 (UW-QOL v4). The primary outcome was any moderate-to-high unmet need on SCNS-SF34. We reported overall and hospital-specific prevalence, domain-level burden, and correlates from mixed-effects logistic regression with hospital clustering interpreted cautiously because only three centers were included. Results: Among 1,407 surveyed survivors, 1,239 questionnaires were valid for analysis (88.1%). Overall, 78.2% reported at least one moderate-to-high unmet need. Health system and information (34.2%) and psychological needs (31.2%) were the most prevalent SCNS-SF34 domains. Dry mouth or sticky saliva (54.6%) and swallowing difficulties (36.8%) were the leading head and neck-specific unmet needs. The median number of moderate-to-high SCNS-SF34 needs per patient was 3 (IQR 2 to 5). Lower UW-QOL composite score (per 10-point decrease: aOR 1.61), rural residence (aOR 1.25), monthly household income below 5,000 CNY (aOR 1.45), stage III to IV disease (aOR 1.25), and multimorbidity of at least two comorbidities (aOR 1.83) were associated with higher odds of unmet needs. In a hospital fixed-effect sensitivity model, the direction and magnitude of the main patient-level associations were materially unchanged. Conclusion: Unmet supportive care needs were common among Chinese head and neck cancer survivors in early survivorship, particularly in information, psychological, salivary, and swallowing domains. The observed associations suggest that routine needs screening and multidisciplinary follow-up pathways may help identify survivors who are more likely to report substantial unmet needs, especially in socioeconomically vulnerable groups. Any service-level interpretation should remain cautious because the evidence is observational and based on three tertiary centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.