ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Association between social capital, eHealth literacy, and digital health literacy among undergraduate students in China: a multigroup analysis based on gender differences.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- E-health literacy status and its influencing factors among college students majoring in sports.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to explore gender differences in the relationships among social capital, eHealth literacy (EHL), and digital health literacy (DHL) among undergraduate students in China, and to support the implementation of the Healthy China and Digital China strategies. Methods: This study collected 1,151 questionnaires from Chinese undergraduate students through snowball sampling via an online platform. DHL was assessed using the Digital Health Literacy Assessment, EHL was assessed using the eHealth Literacy Scale, and social capital was evaluated using the Chinese Simplified Social Capital Scale. SPSS was used to conduct descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and independent-sample Results: The mean DHL score among undergraduate students was 36.27 ± 7.321 (males: 36.65 ± 7.958; females: 36.08 ± 6.975). Social capital showed a positive correlation with DHL, with a stronger standardized direct effect among males (0.107) than females (0.047), although the gender difference was not statistically significant. EHL was positively associated with DHL, with a stronger effect among males (0.847) than females (0.806). Social capital was positively associated with EHL, with a greater direct effect in males (0.410) than females (0.230). The SEM fitness indices were similar between males and females. Conclusion: DHL among undergraduate students was comparatively high, with males scoring slightly higher than females. Social capital was positively associated with DHL, with a stronger effect observed among males. EHL was positively associated with DHL in both genders, again with a stronger effect among males. Social capital was positively associated with EHL among both males and females, with a greater effect observed among males. These findings provide implications for strategies aimed at enhancing DHL among undergraduate students in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.