Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267295›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Ethical considerations and management strategies for fertility preservation in women of reproductive age with malignant tumors: Chinese practices and perspectives.

Ke Wang, Shihui Wang, Jianjiang Gao, Jiahuan Zhang, Jianqing Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ke WangReproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shihui WangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianjiang GaoDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiahuan ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianqing ZhuReproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 2 million women of childbearing age worldwide are diagnosed with malignant tumors each year, with tens of thousands of them facing the risk of fertility loss due to cancer treatment. With the advancement of tumor treatment technology, patient survival rates have significantly improved, and the demand for fertility preservation is increasing. However, tumor treatment damages ovarian function through various mechanisms, leading to temporary or permanent infertility. How to maximize the protection of fertility while controlling tumors has become a key issue in the overall management of tumors. Our review focuses on the ethical and regulatory landscape in China, while drawing selective international comparisons. Method: This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the pathological mechanisms of fertility damage in women with malignant tumors of childbearing age, summarizes the effectiveness and safety of current major fertility preservation techniques (oocyte freezing, embryo freezing, ovarian tissue freezing, Result: ① The survival rate of frozen mature oocytes after thawing can reach 80% -90%, with a cumulative live birth rate of about 33%. However, unmarried patients face legal gray areas such as cross institutional transportation of frozen eggs and the right to dispose of them after death; ② Embryo freezing technology is the most mature, and the pregnancy rate of frozen thawed embryo transfer is higher than that of fresh embryos, but it is only suitable for married patients, and their reproductive autonomy is limited after divorce; ③ Ovarian tissue freezing is suitable for patients in need of emergency treatment or pre puberty, with a sustained pregnancy/live birth rate of approximately 37.7% after transplantation, but there is a risk of tumor cell reintroduction (approximately 1%, with leukemia patients having the highest risk); ④ Conclusion: Fertility preservation requires the establishment of a patient-centered decision support system, incorporating psychological assessment and family communication into the counseling process; Establishing an institutionalized multidisciplinary collaboration model to eliminate the practical gap from cognition to referral; Improve ethical regulations and legal frameworks, clarify gray areas such as egg freezing, cross institutional transportation, and post death disposal rights for unmarried patients; Establish a long-term follow-up and social support network to accumulate offspring health and safety data. Only through multidimensional collaboration of technological application, ethical considerations, standardized management, and social support can we protect the fertility hope and dignity of cancer patients while curing the disease.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationInfertility, FemaleNeoplasmsChinaCryopreservationEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansfertility managementfertility preservationmalignant tumorreproductive ethicswomen of childbearing age

Identifiers

PMID42267295
PMCPMC13243006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.