ArticleSmart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Implementation of a pragmatic pathway to ensure high-quality processing of heterogeneous remote health sensing data.
Article in Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remote health monitoring systems (RHMS) can improve access to care and health outcomes by enabling continuous monitoring of an individual's overall health status outside traditional clinical settings. However, ensuring data quality and effectively cleaning and processing complex, heterogeneous RHMS sensing data collected in naturalistic environments can present unique challenges. This article presents a pragmatic approach to clean and process RHMS data received from multiple devices/sources (e.g., wearables, ambient environmental sensors) in various formats (e. g., JSON, CSV) during real-word deployments. Our proposed pathway is highly relevant given the growing use of RHMS to support home-based healthcare and provides a useful guide for others engaged in similar research. The pathway describes a series of key steps implemented by our interdisciplinary team, including data preparation, processing, enrichment, and quality assurance, all designed to ensure that the highest quality data are available for analysis. Each step is illustrated through examples from deployments of the Behavioral and Environmental Sensing and Intervention for Cancer (BESI-C), a remote health monitoring system designed to empower patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers to monitor cancer pain and distress at home. This paper fills an important gap in the literature by focusing on the "critical middle" of the RHMS data life cycle (data extraction to preparation for analysis) to ensure accurate conclusions are drawn from data output. Our proposed pathway is applicable to other RHMS, across various patient populations and contexts, that collect diverse data streams in real-world settings and offers a strategy to address those challenges and optimize health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.