ArticleCancer2026
Examining bidirectional longitudinal relationships between physical activity and physical function in older breast cancer survivors: The Thinking and Living with Cancer study.
Article in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder breast cancer survivors are susceptible to cancer- and treatment-related losses in physical function that can negatively affect daily living activities, mobility, and independence. Although physical activity can improve physical function, few studies have focused on older survivors or explored interrelationships between physical activity and physical function. Longitudinal bidirectional relationships between physical activity and physical function in breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls aged 60+ years were evaluated.
methodsSurvivors (aged 67 ± 7 years; n = 357) newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer (stages 0-III) and noncancer controls (aged 67 ± 9 years; n = 254) were assessed at baseline (postsurgery and pre-systemic therapy among survivors) and annual visits for up to 36 months. Physical activity (steps per day) was assessed via actigraphy. The Timed Up and Go test (longer time indicates lower function) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score evaluated physical function. Data were analyzed via random-intercepts cross-lagged panel models, with controlling for covariates; p values of ˂.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsStarting from the 12-month visit, higher daily steps predicted better subsequent Timed Up and Go time among survivors and controls, and the magnitude of effect was stronger for survivors than controls at 24 months (post hoc comparison, p = .036; survivors: β = -0.420; p = .003; controls: β = -0.211; p = .032). Timed Up and Go time did not predict later daily steps. Associations between steps and the Physical Component Score showed similar patterns.
conclusionsHigher daily steps predicted better subsequent physical function, especially in survivors. These results highlight the importance of promoting physical activity during cancer survivorship care to maintain functional independence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.