ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2026
Functional Metagenomics Insights Into the Allium ampeloprasum Rhizosphere Microbiome Under Different Fertilization Regimes.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fertilization practices shape the taxonomy, functional composition, and metabolic functions of the microbiome within the rhizosphere. Nonetheless, the impacts of various fertilization approaches on the functional composition of Allium ampeloprasum rhizosphere microbiomes remain underexplored. This study investigated how biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers impact the microbial functional categories of the A. ampeloprasum rhizosphere, hypothesizing that fertilization systems influence the metabolic profile. The genomic DNA was successfully extracted from the collected soil samples and processed via shotgun metagenomics sequencing. The application of biofertilizers enhanced the rhizosphere microbiome, revealing similar microbial orders across all plots, although plot G2 was uniquely enriched with those belonging to phyla Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, actinobacteria, Myxococcota, and Verrucomicrobiota. Biofertilizers promoted a broader range of microbial functions, primarily at EggNOG level 1. Notably, the α diversity significantly differed (p < 0.05) among the soil samples. The functional diversity was linked to the soil physicochemical attributes, particularly the carbon and moisture contents, as illustrated by the RDA. Biofertilizer increases microbial diversity, underscoring the need to understand the rhizosphere microbiome to advance sustainable agricultural methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.