Article in Virulence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Dufu LiKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-0211-5779
Tingyue HuangKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5254-0269
Qianmin HaiKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6582-9739
Qiang MaKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.
Xuelu LiuKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoqun DangKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6730-5138
Zhengang MaKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6178-1988
Jinshan XuKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4963-3410
Zeyang ZhouKey Laboratory of Pollinator Resources Conservation and Utilization of the Upper Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Unlike vertebrates, which use adaptive immunity, insects depend on humoral and cellular innate immunity to resist pathogens, with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) like C-type lectins (CTLs) critical for recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). CTLs are a diverse, mostly Ca
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
The C-type lectin AcCTL5 from · full record | Socratic