ReviewChinese medical journal2026
Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease: From current evidence, clinical translation, and the road to precision medicine.
Review in Chinese medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractArtificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, supporting disease management and enabling outcome prediction across multiple clinical settings. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are complex, heterogeneous conditions whose assessment relies on integrating several modalities, including endoscopy, histology, cross-sectional imaging, and omics data, all of which are critical for evaluating disease activity and predicting long-term outcomes. In recent years, numerous AI-based systems have been developed within each of these domains. In IBD endoscopy, deep learning algorithms have demonstrated high accuracy in objectively assessing mucosal inflammation and detecting colitis-associated dysplasia. In histology, AI applications enable automated, standardized evaluation of disease activity, reducing interobserver variability. Similarly, in cross-sectional imaging, AI models have shown promise in characterizing disease severity, identifying complications, and supporting outcome prediction. Beyond individual modalities, machine learning approaches are increasingly being explored to integrate complex clinical, imaging, and multi-omics data to predict disease trajectories and enable precision medicine strategies in IBD. The present review provides an overview of current AI applications across endoscopy, histology, imaging, and omics in IBD, highlighting its potential clinical impact and ability to advance precision medicine strategies through multimodal and multi-omics integration. Moreover, it discusses the main challenges, unmet needs, and limitations that remain barriers to adoption in clinical trials and routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.