Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42268377›Full record

ReviewPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2026

History of SCS and patient-focused innovations: a manufacturer's perspective on the role of technology.

Michael A Fishman, John A Hatheway, Krishnan Chakravarthy, Jan Willem Kallewaard, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Leonardo Kapural, Sean Li, Yashar Eshraghi, Melissa Murphy, Navdeep Jassal and 5 more

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael A FishmanMichael Fishman PLLC, Lebanon, PA, 17042, United States.
John A HathewayColumbia Pain Management, Hood River, OR, 97031, United States.
Krishnan ChakravarthyVA San Diego Healthcare, San Diego, CA, 92161, United States.
Jan Willem KallewaardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, 6815 AD, Netherlands.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53715, United States.
Leonardo KapuralCarolinas Pain Institute and Queen City Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2718-5837
Sean LiPremier Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, NJ, 07702, United States.
Yashar EshraghiOchsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, 70115, United States.
Melissa MurphyNorth Texas Orthopedics & Spine Center, Grapevine, TX, 76051, United States.
Navdeep JassalEXCEL Pain and Spine, Brandon, FL, 33511, United States.
Peter StaatsNational Spine and Pain Centers, FL, 32233, United States.
Jacob CaylorCentral Texas Pain Center PLLC, Cedar Park, TX, 78613, United States.
Prabhdeep K GrewalPain Management, Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, San Antonio, TX, 78216, United States.
Lisa M JohanekMedtronic Neuromodulation, Minneapolis, MN, 55432, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-1139-5282
Julia E GamacheMedtronic Neuromodulation, Minneapolis, MN, 55432, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3750-147X

Funding

Medtronic Neuromodulation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first case study of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for pain treatment, published in 1967, catalyzed decades of research to improve and optimize this therapy. CONTENT OVERVIEW: This article provides an overview of the history of SCS technology, including advances made by industrial and academic innovators in lead designs, neurostimulator features, and battery chemistry. Foundational randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a timeline of key product releases from the early 1970s are highlighted. The second half of the article discusses SCS technology advancements from a manufacturer's perspective and how they relate to improving the overall patient therapy experience.

conclusionsSpecific SCS technology advancements that have focused on the patient's needs include: The development of patient programmers, enhanced rechargeable battery technology, position-adaptive neurostimulators, full-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditionality, and sensing-based closed-loop features.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementSpinal Cord StimulationHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumanschronic painclosed-loopneurostimulatorspinal cord stimulationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID42268377
PMCPMC13250577

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.