ArticleHealth care management science2026
Toward generalizable and interpretable machine learning models in healthcare: Insights from ICU outcome predictions.
Article in Health care management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare management offers high potential. In particular, resource allocation and operational decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) can benefit from ML predictions, leading to improvements in patient outcomes and operational efficiency. However, the generalizability of these models across diverse hospital settings with potentially different patient populations remains a critical challenge. This study examines the generalizability of ML-based ICU outcome prediction models built using external data. We utilize data from two sources: a European University Hospital (EUH) dataset from Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database, representing different healthcare systems and patient populations. Our approach evaluates multiple models of varying architectures and complexity across three common prediction tasks in ICU settings (mortality, length of stay, and readmission), analyzes the impact of data availability on model performance, and applies interpretability techniques to identify features and scenarios where models succeed or fail in new environments. We found that locally trained models generally outperform those using external data when sufficient local data is available. Low and medium complexity models, such as generalized additive models, demonstrate significantly superior generalizability compared to high complexity models and require substantially less local data for high-quality predictions, offering evidence-based guidance for healthcare managers dealing with limited data resources. Our results demonstrate how interpretability techniques can identify dataset differences that hinder generalizability, providing valuable insights for healthcare practitioners in implementing ML solutions across diverse hospitals. This research contributes to the development of more generalizable and interpretable ML models in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.