Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42268427›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2026

Toward generalizable and interpretable machine learning models in healthcare: Insights from ICU outcome predictions.

Lasse Bohlen, Julian Rosenberger, Nico Hambauer, Daniel Zähringer, Volkmar Franz, Patrick Zschech, Mathias Kraus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lasse BohlenTechnische Universität Dresden, Helmholtzstraße 10, Dresden, 01069, Germany. lasse.bohlen@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-1497
Julian RosenbergerUniversität Regensburg, Bajuwarenstraße 4, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8987-3910
Nico HambauerUniversität Regensburg, Bajuwarenstraße 4, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7116-3729
Daniel ZähringerTechnische Universität Dresden, Helmholtzstraße 10, Dresden, 01069, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9836-0668
Volkmar FranzUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Patrick ZschechTechnische Universität Dresden, Helmholtzstraße 10, Dresden, 01069, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1105-8086
Mathias KrausUniversität Regensburg, Bajuwarenstraße 4, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2021-2743

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare management offers high potential. In particular, resource allocation and operational decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) can benefit from ML predictions, leading to improvements in patient outcomes and operational efficiency. However, the generalizability of these models across diverse hospital settings with potentially different patient populations remains a critical challenge. This study examines the generalizability of ML-based ICU outcome prediction models built using external data. We utilize data from two sources: a European University Hospital (EUH) dataset from Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database, representing different healthcare systems and patient populations. Our approach evaluates multiple models of varying architectures and complexity across three common prediction tasks in ICU settings (mortality, length of stay, and readmission), analyzes the impact of data availability on model performance, and applies interpretability techniques to identify features and scenarios where models succeed or fail in new environments. We found that locally trained models generally outperform those using external data when sufficient local data is available. Low and medium complexity models, such as generalized additive models, demonstrate significantly superior generalizability compared to high complexity models and require substantially less local data for high-quality predictions, offering evidence-based guidance for healthcare managers dealing with limited data resources. Our results demonstrate how interpretability techniques can identify dataset differences that hinder generalizability, providing valuable insights for healthcare practitioners in implementing ML solutions across diverse hospitals. This research contributes to the development of more generalizable and interpretable ML models in healthcare.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMachine LearningGermanyHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayPatient ReadmissionPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsGeneralizabilityHealthcareIntensive Care UnitsInterpretabilityMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42268427
PMCPMC13253713

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.