ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting delirium risk in postoperative brain tumor patients in the Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to clarify the incidence and influencing factors of delirium in ICU patients after brain tumor surgery, construct and validate delirium risk prediction models using multiple machine learning algorithms, identify the optimal model, and develop a personalized risk calculation tool to provide evidence-based support for early precise identification of high-risk patients and targeted preventive interventions.
methodsConsecutive convenient sampling was adopted. A total of 600 patients who underwent brain tumor surgery in a Grade A tertiary hospital in Nanchang (July 2021-December 2024) served as the modeling cohort, and 160 similar patients (January-August 2025) as the external validation cohort. LASSO regression screened independent risk factors from 26 candidates. Five models (LR, ANN, RF, DT, SVM) were constructed and evaluated by sensitivity, AUC, DCA, etc. SHAP interpreted the optimal model's feature importance.
resultsFive independent risk factors were identified: age, APACHE II score, postoperative GCS score, use of diuretics or dehydrating agents, and mechanical ventilation duration. The SVM model performed best: validation set AUC = 0.857 (95%CI:0.814-0.898), test set AUC = 0.847, external validation accuracy 70.00%. SHAP showed diuretics or dehydrating agents were the most important feature (mean |SHAP|=0.1625). An online risk calculator was developed for convenient personalized assessment.
conclusionsThe SVM-based predictive model has excellent efficacy and generalizability. The easy-to-operate risk calculator can effectively identify high-risk patients early, providing scientific support for precise delirium prevention and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42268477What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.