SynthesisMetabolic brain disease2026
Mitochondrial enzyme dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of human metabolic evidence.
Synthesis in Metabolic brain disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by progressive cognitive decline accompanied by profound disturbances in cerebral energy metabolism. Mitochondrial dysfunction has long been implicated in AD pathophysiology; however, the specific contribution of mitochondrial enzymes in human disease remains fragmented across heterogeneous studies. Enzymes regulating carbon entry into the tricarboxylic acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, and redox balance represent key metabolic control points whose dysfunction may contribute to neuronal vulnerability. To systematically synthesize human evidence on mitochondrial enzyme alterations in Alzheimer's disease and to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative meta-analysis based on current reporting practices. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception through January 2026 in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were included if they investigated mitochondrial enzymes in human postmortem brain tissue, human-derived cellular models, or peripheral biospecimens. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The feasibility of meta-analysis was evaluated based on the availability and comparability of group-level summary statistics. Fifteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final synthesis. Mitochondrial enzymes involved in carbon entry into the tricarboxylic acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, redox regulation, and neurotransmitter-linked mitochondrial metabolism were the most frequently investigated targets. Direct enzyme-activity evidence most consistently implicated selected metabolic control points, particularly PDHC and αKGDHC, whereas additional studies supported mitochondrial impairment through protein or post-translational modification changes, respiratory dysfunction, redox alterations, or RNA-regulatory mechanisms. Quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneous assay methodologies, variable normalization strategies, and inconsistent reporting of group-level summary statistics. Human evidence consistently implicates mitochondrial enzyme dysfunction as a central metabolic feature of Alzheimer's disease. However, progress toward cumulative quantitative synthesis remains limited by methodological heterogeneity and incomplete reporting of enzyme activity outcomes. Standardized measurement and reporting of mitochondrial enzyme alterations will be essential to advance mechanistic understanding and enable future meta-analytic integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42268484What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.